mitmproxy vs dnscrypt-proxy
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted reverse proxy & gateways options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
mitmproxy
Interactive HTTPS proxy for inspection and debugging
VS
dnscrypt-proxy
Encrypted DNS proxy supporting DNSCrypt and DoH
| Feature | mitmproxy | dnscrypt-proxy |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Reverse Proxy & Gateways | Reverse Proxy & Gateways |
| License | MIT | ISC |
| Language | Python | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary, source | binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 44,605 | ★ 13,554 |
| First released | 2010 | 2018 |
| Replaces | Charles Proxy, Fiddler | Cloudflare WARP |
Why pick each one
Choose dnscrypt-proxy if…
- Released under the ISC license
- Mature project with 13.6k GitHub stars
- Written in Go
- Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is mitmproxy or dnscrypt-proxy better?
mitmproxy is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider dnscrypt-proxy if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are mitmproxy and dnscrypt-proxy free and open-source?
Yes. mitmproxy is licensed under MIT and dnscrypt-proxy under ISC. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run mitmproxy and dnscrypt-proxy with Docker?
mitmproxy: yes. dnscrypt-proxy: check the project docs for container support.