Danbooru vs Pinry
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Danbooru
Self-hostable tag-based image board and gallery
VS
Pinry
Tiling image board and bookmark system for visual collections
| Feature | Danbooru | Pinry |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Photo Management | Bookmarks & Read-It-Later |
| License | MIT | BSD-2-Clause |
| Language | Ruby | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 2,048 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, source | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 2,776 | ★ 3,402 |
| First released | 2005 | 2012 |
| Replaces | Pinterest, Eagle | Pinterest, Raindrop.io |
Why pick each one
Choose Pinry if…
- Released under the BSD-2-Clause license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (3.4k GitHub stars)
- Written in Python
Frequently asked questions
Is Danbooru or Pinry better?
Pinry is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider Danbooru if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Danbooru and Pinry free and open-source?
Yes. Danbooru is licensed under MIT and Pinry under BSD-2-Clause. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Danbooru and Pinry with Docker?
Danbooru: yes. Pinry: yes.