Danbooru vs exifr
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted photo management options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Danbooru
Self-hostable tag-based image board and gallery
VS
exifr
Fast JavaScript EXIF and metadata reader for photos
| Feature | Danbooru | exifr |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Photo Management | Photo Management |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | Ruby | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 2,048 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker, source | bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 2,776 | ★ 1,245 |
| First released | 2005 | 2019 |
| Replaces | Pinterest, Eagle | Commercial metadata APIs |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Danbooru or exifr better?
Neither is universally better. Danbooru has the larger community, while exifr is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Danbooru and exifr free and open-source?
Yes. Danbooru is licensed under MIT and exifr under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Danbooru and exifr with Docker?
Danbooru: yes. exifr: check the project docs for container support.