Danbooru vs gallery-dl
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted photo management options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Danbooru
Self-hostable tag-based image board and gallery
VS
gallery-dl
Command-line tool to download image galleries from websites
| Feature | Danbooru | gallery-dl |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Photo Management | Photo Management |
| License | MIT | GPL-2.0 |
| Language | Ruby | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 2,048 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker, source | bare-metal, binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 2,776 | ★ 19,143 |
| First released | 2005 | 2015 |
| Replaces | Pinterest, Eagle | Manual downloads |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Danbooru or gallery-dl better?
gallery-dl is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Danbooru if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Danbooru and gallery-dl free and open-source?
Yes. Danbooru is licensed under MIT and gallery-dl under GPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Danbooru and gallery-dl with Docker?
Danbooru: yes. gallery-dl: check the project docs for container support.