Danbooru vs ExifCleaner
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted photo management options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Danbooru
Self-hostable tag-based image board and gallery
VS
ExifCleaner
Cross-platform tool to remove metadata from images
| Feature | Danbooru | ExifCleaner |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Photo Management | Photo Management |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | Ruby | Perl |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 2,048 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker, source | binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 2,776 | ★ 2,552 |
| First released | 2005 | 2019 |
| Replaces | Pinterest, Eagle | Online metadata removers |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Danbooru or ExifCleaner better?
Neither is universally better. Danbooru has the larger community, while ExifCleaner is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Danbooru and ExifCleaner free and open-source?
Yes. Danbooru is licensed under MIT and ExifCleaner under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Danbooru and ExifCleaner with Docker?
Danbooru: yes. ExifCleaner: check the project docs for container support.