CrowdSec vs mitmproxy
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted reverse proxy & gateways options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
CrowdSec
Collaborative open-source intrusion prevention system
VS
mitmproxy
Interactive HTTPS proxy for inspection and debugging
| Feature | CrowdSec | mitmproxy |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Reverse Proxy & Gateways | Reverse Proxy & Gateways |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | Go | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary | docker, binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 14,461 | ★ 44,605 |
| First released | 2020 | 2010 |
| Replaces | Cloudflare WAF, Fail2ban | Charles Proxy, Fiddler |
Why pick each one
Choose CrowdSec if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 14.5k GitHub stars
- Written in Go
Frequently asked questions
Is CrowdSec or mitmproxy better?
mitmproxy is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider CrowdSec if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are CrowdSec and mitmproxy free and open-source?
Yes. CrowdSec is licensed under MIT and mitmproxy under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run CrowdSec and mitmproxy with Docker?
CrowdSec: yes. mitmproxy: yes.