copyparty vs Pydio Cells Client

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturecopypartyPydio Cells Client
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseMITAGPL-3.0
LanguagePythonGo
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM64 MB64 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarybinary
GitHub stars★ 46,121★ 32
First released20192019
ReplacesDropbox, Google DriveDropbox, Box

Why pick each one

Choose copyparty if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 46.1k GitHub stars
copyparty details

Choose Pydio Cells Client if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • Written in Go
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
Pydio Cells Client details

Frequently asked questions

Is copyparty or Pydio Cells Client better?

copyparty is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Pydio Cells Client if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are copyparty and Pydio Cells Client free and open-source?

Yes. copyparty is licensed under MIT and Pydio Cells Client under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run copyparty and Pydio Cells Client with Docker?

copyparty: yes. Pydio Cells Client: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons