copyparty vs slskd

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
Featurecopypartyslskd
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseMITAGPL-3.0
LanguagePythonC#
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM64 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarydocker
GitHub stars★ 46,121★ 3,698
First released20192026
ReplacesDropbox, Google Drive

Why pick each one

Choose copyparty if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 46.1k GitHub stars
copyparty details

Choose slskd if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (3.7k GitHub stars)
  • Written in C#
slskd details

Frequently asked questions

Is copyparty or slskd better?

copyparty is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider slskd if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are copyparty and slskd free and open-source?

Yes. copyparty is licensed under MIT and slskd under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run copyparty and slskd with Docker?

copyparty: yes. slskd: yes.

Related comparisons