copyparty vs Send

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturecopypartySend
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseMITMPL-2.0
LanguagePythonJavaScript
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM64 MB256 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarydocker
GitHub stars★ 46,121★ 5,847
First released20192020
ReplacesDropbox, Google DriveWeTransfer, Firefox Send

Why pick each one

Choose copyparty if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 46.1k GitHub stars
copyparty details

Choose Send if…

  • Released under the MPL-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 5.8k GitHub stars
  • Written in JavaScript
Send details

Frequently asked questions

Is copyparty or Send better?

copyparty is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Send if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are copyparty and Send free and open-source?

Yes. copyparty is licensed under MIT and Send under MPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run copyparty and Send with Docker?

copyparty: yes. Send: yes.

Related comparisons