copyparty vs Davros

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturecopypartyDavros
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseMITMIT
LanguagePythonJavaScript
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM64 MB128 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarydocker, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 46,121★ 301
First released20192014
ReplacesDropbox, Google DriveDropbox

Why pick each one

Choose copyparty if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 46.1k GitHub stars
copyparty details

Choose Davros if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in JavaScript
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Davros details

Frequently asked questions

Is copyparty or Davros better?

copyparty is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Davros if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are copyparty and Davros free and open-source?

Yes. copyparty is licensed under MIT and Davros under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run copyparty and Davros with Docker?

copyparty: yes. Davros: yes.

Related comparisons