copyparty vs Pydio Cells Sync

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturecopypartyPydio Cells Sync
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseMITAGPL-3.0
LanguagePythonC
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM64 MB128 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarybare-metal, binary
GitHub stars★ 46,121★ 44
First released20192019
ReplacesDropbox, Google DriveDropbox, OneDrive

Why pick each one

Choose copyparty if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 46.1k GitHub stars
copyparty details

Choose Pydio Cells Sync if…

  • Tight Cells integration
  • Cross-platform desktop app
Pydio Cells Sync details

Frequently asked questions

Is copyparty or Pydio Cells Sync better?

copyparty is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Pydio Cells Sync if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are copyparty and Pydio Cells Sync free and open-source?

Yes. copyparty is licensed under MIT and Pydio Cells Sync under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run copyparty and Pydio Cells Sync with Docker?

copyparty: yes. Pydio Cells Sync: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons