conduwuit vs Tinode
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted matrix & xmpp options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
conduwuit
Well-maintained fork of the Conduit Matrix homeserver
VS
Tinode
Open-source instant messaging server
| Feature | conduwuit | Tinode |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Matrix & XMPP | Matrix & XMPP |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | Rust | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary, source | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 24 | ★ 13,452 |
| First released | 2024 | 2016 |
| Replaces | Slack, Discord | WhatsApp, Slack |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is conduwuit or Tinode better?
Neither is universally better. Tinode has the larger community, while conduwuit is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are conduwuit and Tinode free and open-source?
Yes. conduwuit is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Tinode under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run conduwuit and Tinode with Docker?
conduwuit: yes. Tinode: yes.