ejabberd vs Tinode

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted matrix & xmpp options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureejabberdTinode
CategoryMatrix & XMPPMatrix & XMPP
LicenseGPL-2.0GPL-3.0
LanguageErlangGo
Setup difficultyHardMedium
Min. RAM512 MB256 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metaldocker, binary
GitHub stars★ 6,711★ 13,452
First released20022016
ReplacesSlack, WhatsAppWhatsApp, Slack

Why pick each one

Choose ejabberd if…

  • Extremely scalable
  • Battle-tested
  • Standards-based
ejabberd details

Choose Tinode if…

  • Good developer foundation
  • Multiple clients
  • Lightweight
Tinode details

Frequently asked questions

Is ejabberd or Tinode better?

Tinode is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider ejabberd if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are ejabberd and Tinode free and open-source?

Yes. ejabberd is licensed under GPL-2.0 and Tinode under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run ejabberd and Tinode with Docker?

ejabberd: yes. Tinode: yes.

Related comparisons