Converse.js vs ejabberd

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted matrix & xmpp options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureConverse.jsejabberd
CategoryMatrix & XMPPMatrix & XMPP
LicenseMPL-2.0GPL-2.0
LanguageJavaScriptErlang
Setup difficultyEasyHard
Min. RAM64 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metal, sourcedocker, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 3,285★ 6,711
First released20132002
ReplacesSlackSlack, WhatsApp

Why pick each one

Choose Converse.js if…

  • Released under the MPL-2.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (3.3k GitHub stars)
Converse.js details

Choose ejabberd if…

  • Extremely scalable
  • Battle-tested
  • Standards-based
ejabberd details

Frequently asked questions

Is Converse.js or ejabberd better?

Neither is universally better. ejabberd has the larger community, while Converse.js is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Converse.js and ejabberd free and open-source?

Yes. Converse.js is licensed under MPL-2.0 and ejabberd under GPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Converse.js and ejabberd with Docker?

Converse.js: yes. ejabberd: yes.

Related comparisons