Conductor OSS vs Luigi
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted automation & workflows options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Conductor OSS
Microservices and workflow orchestration engine
VS
Luigi
Python module for building complex batch job pipelines
| Feature | Conductor OSS | Luigi |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Automation & Workflows | Automation & Workflows |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Java | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 2,048 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes, bare-metal | bare-metal, binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 32,066 | ★ 18,762 |
| First released | 2016 | 2012 |
| Replaces | AWS Step Functions, Camunda | AWS Step Functions |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Conductor OSS or Luigi better?
Neither is universally better. Conductor OSS has the larger community, while Luigi is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Conductor OSS and Luigi free and open-source?
Yes. Conductor OSS is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Luigi under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Conductor OSS and Luigi with Docker?
Conductor OSS: yes. Luigi: check the project docs for container support.