Apache Airflow vs Luigi
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted automation & workflows options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Apache Airflow
Programmatically author, schedule and monitor workflows
VS
Luigi
Python module for building complex batch job pipelines
| Feature | Apache Airflow | Luigi |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Automation & Workflows | Automation & Workflows |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Python | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 4,096 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes, helm | bare-metal, binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 46,409 | ★ 18,762 |
| First released | 2015 | 2012 |
| Replaces | AWS Step Functions, Azure Data Factory | AWS Step Functions |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Apache Airflow or Luigi better?
Neither is universally better. Apache Airflow has the larger community, while Luigi is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Apache Airflow and Luigi free and open-source?
Yes. Apache Airflow is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Luigi under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Apache Airflow and Luigi with Docker?
Apache Airflow: yes. Luigi: check the project docs for container support.