Conductor OSS
Microservices and workflow orchestration engine
Conductor is a platform created to orchestrate microservices and business processes at scale. It lets teams define workflows as JSON and run them across distributed task workers.
Key features
- JSON-defined workflows
- Distributed task workers
- Visual workflow editor
- Built for microservice orchestration
Pros & cons
Strengths
- Battle-tested at scale
- Language-agnostic workers
Trade-offs
- Java stack is resource heavy
Conductor OSS replaces
Last reviewed Aug 26, 2026 · 808 words
Conductor OSS is the wrong tool for 9 out of 10 people who find it while searching for "self-hosted automation". It does not have triggers for your smart home, it does not ship with 400 SaaS integrations, and it needs about 2 GB of RAM before it does anything. What it does is orchestrate long-running, multi-step business processes across services written in different languages, with retries, timeouts and a full execution history, at a scale where Netflix trusted it for years. If that sentence describes your problem, nothing else in the automation category does it as well. If it doesn't, n8n will make you happier by lunchtime.
What "orchestration" means here, and why it isn't n8n
The mental model is a state machine you define in JSON. A workflow is a list of tasks: SIMPLE tasks that a worker process picks up, plus system tasks the server runs itself, such as HTTP, SWITCH, FORK_JOIN, DO_WHILE, WAIT and SUB_WORKFLOW. Workers poll the server over HTTP for tasks of their type, do the work, and post the result back. The server persists every state transition, so a workflow that takes 3 days because step 4 waits on a human approval is normal, and a crash halfway through resumes rather than restarts.
n8n, by contrast, executes a node graph inside one process, fast and visual, and treats a 3-day wait as an edge case. Conductor treats the 3-day wait as the whole point. The visual editor Conductor ships is a viewer and debugger for that JSON, not the primary authoring surface.
The stack you are actually running
The 2 GB minimum in the catalogue is honest and, for a busy instance, generous in the wrong direction. Conductor is a Java server backed by a persistence store (Redis or Postgres) and, optionally, Elasticsearch or OpenSearch for indexing workflow search. Plan on 3 containers minimum:
services:
conductor-server:
image: conductoross/conductor:latest
ports:
- "8080:8080" # REST API and Swagger
- "5000:5000" # UI
environment:
- CONFIG_PROP=config-redis.properties
depends_on:
- redis
redis:
image: redis:7-alpine
The repository's docker/ directory carries the maintained compose files with Postgres and Elasticsearch variants; use those rather than my sketch when you go past experimenting. The JVM will take whatever heap you allow it, so set JAVA_OPTS=-Xmx1g explicitly or it will claim half the box.
The Netflix history matters for one practical reason
Netflix open-sourced Conductor in 2016 and archived their repository at the end of 2023. The conductor-oss organisation, with Orkes as the main commercial steward, is where development continued, and the 32,128 stars on the catalogue entry belong to that fork. The practical consequence: search results and Stack Overflow answers from the Netflix era still work for workflow definitions, but Docker image names, Maven coordinates and some configuration property names changed. When a tutorial references netflixoss/conductor, expect to translate.
Workers in any language is the real selling point
Because workers only speak HTTP, you can write them in whatever the task suits. The project maintains SDKs for Java, Python, Go, C#, JavaScript and Clojure. A Python worker is around 20 lines: subscribe to a task type, implement a function that takes the input dict and returns an output dict, run the poller. This is the feature that beats Camunda for polyglot teams and beats AWS Step Functions for anyone who doesn't want to be billed per state transition. It is also why "self-hosted" here means running a thing your own services integrate with, not a thing that integrates with your services.
Where it fits against the alternatives
| You need | Pick |
|---|---|
| Glue between SaaS apps, webhooks, a cron with a UI | n8n |
| Durable code-first workflows with the logic in your language | Temporal |
| Scripts and jobs with a UI, Postgres-native | Windmill |
| JSON-defined microservice orchestration, polyglot workers, audit trail | Conductor OSS |
Temporal is the closest rival and the harder call. Temporal keeps workflow logic in code with replay-based durability, which developers tend to prefer; Conductor keeps it in JSON definitions the server owns, which operations teams tend to prefer because a workflow can be versioned and changed without a deploy. Both are heavy. Neither is a homelab tool.
What I'd do
If I ran a small engineering team with 3 or more services that needed to coordinate multi-step processes, I'd stand up Conductor OSS with Postgres persistence, skip Elasticsearch until workflow search became a daily need, cap the JVM at 1 GB, and write the first workers in Python. I'd budget a week to learn the task types properly. For anything else, including every personal automation I run, I'd close the tab and install n8n. Conductor is superb at a job most self-hosters do not have.
Compare Conductor OSS
9 head-to-head comparisons.
Similar automation & workflows apps
n8n
Automation & WorkflowsWorkflow automation with a node-based editor
Replaces Zapier, Make
Firecrawl
Automation & WorkflowsTurn websites into clean data for AI applications
Replaces Apify
Crawl4AI
Automation & WorkflowsOpen-source web crawler built for LLM data pipelines
Replaces Firecrawl
Huginn
Automation & WorkflowsAgents that monitor and act on your behalf
Replaces IFTTT, Zapier
Apache Airflow
Automation & WorkflowsProgrammatically author, schedule and monitor workflows
Replaces AWS Step Functions, Azure Data Factory
ToolJet
Automation & WorkflowsLow-code platform for building and automating business tools
Replaces Retool, Microsoft Power Apps