Concrete CMS vs SPIP
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted content management systems options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Concrete CMS
In-context editing CMS for marketers and site owners
VS
SPIP
CMS with a focus on collaborative edition and multilingualism
| Feature | Concrete CMS | SPIP |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Content Management Systems | Content Management Systems |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0-or-later |
| Language | PHP | |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 50 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 850 | — |
| First released | 2008 | 2023 |
| Replaces | Wix, Squarespace | Blogger, Coldfusion, Wix |
Why pick each one
Choose Concrete CMS if…
- Very approachable for non-technical editors
- No separate admin needed for content
Choose SPIP if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0-or-later license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Tiny footprint — runs in 50 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Concrete CMS or SPIP better?
Neither is universally better. Concrete CMS has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Concrete CMS and SPIP free and open-source?
Yes. Concrete CMS is licensed under MIT and SPIP under GPL-3.0-or-later. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Concrete CMS and SPIP with Docker?
Concrete CMS: yes. SPIP: check the project docs for container support.