Cloudflare DDNS vs mitmproxy

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted reverse proxy & gateways options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureCloudflare DDNSmitmproxy
CategoryReverse Proxy & GatewaysReverse Proxy & Gateways
LicensefreeMIT
LanguageTypeScriptPython
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM512 MB256 MB
Deploymentdocker, one-clickdocker, binary, source
GitHub stars★ 244★ 44,605
First released20232010
ReplacesCharles Proxy, Fiddler

Why pick each one

Choose Cloudflare DDNS if…

  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • One-click install on common self-host platforms
  • Written in TypeScript
Cloudflare DDNS details

Choose mitmproxy if…

  • Powerful for debugging
  • Highly scriptable
mitmproxy details

Frequently asked questions

Is Cloudflare DDNS or mitmproxy better?

Neither is universally better. mitmproxy has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Cloudflare DDNS and mitmproxy free and open-source?

Yes. Cloudflare DDNS is licensed under free and mitmproxy under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Cloudflare DDNS and mitmproxy with Docker?

Cloudflare DDNS: yes. mitmproxy: yes.

Related comparisons