Cloudflare DDNS vs Kong Gateway

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted reverse proxy & gateways options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureCloudflare DDNSKong Gateway
CategoryReverse Proxy & GatewaysReverse Proxy & Gateways
LicensefreeApache-2.0
LanguageTypeScriptLua
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM512 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, one-clickdocker, kubernetes, helm
GitHub stars★ 244★ 43,947
First released20232015
ReplacesAWS API Gateway, Apigee

Why pick each one

Choose Cloudflare DDNS if…

  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • One-click install on common self-host platforms
  • Written in TypeScript
Cloudflare DDNS details

Choose Kong Gateway if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 43.9k GitHub stars
Kong Gateway details

Frequently asked questions

Is Cloudflare DDNS or Kong Gateway better?

Neither is universally better. Kong Gateway has the larger community, while Cloudflare DDNS is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Cloudflare DDNS and Kong Gateway free and open-source?

Yes. Cloudflare DDNS is licensed under free and Kong Gateway under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Cloudflare DDNS and Kong Gateway with Docker?

Cloudflare DDNS: yes. Kong Gateway: yes.

Related comparisons