Caddy vs Kong Gateway

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted reverse proxy & gateways options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureCaddyKong Gateway
CategoryReverse Proxy & GatewaysReverse Proxy & Gateways
LicenseApache-2.0Apache-2.0
LanguageGoLua
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM64 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, binary, bare-metaldocker, kubernetes, helm
GitHub stars★ 74,748★ 43,947
First released20152015
ReplacesNginx, ApacheAWS API Gateway, Apigee

Why pick each one

Choose Caddy if…

  • Zero-config TLS
  • Easy to learn
Caddy details

Choose Kong Gateway if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 43.9k GitHub stars
Kong Gateway details

Frequently asked questions

Is Caddy or Kong Gateway better?

Caddy is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Kong Gateway if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Caddy and Kong Gateway free and open-source?

Yes. Caddy is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Kong Gateway under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Caddy and Kong Gateway with Docker?

Caddy: yes. Kong Gateway: yes.

Related comparisons