AdGuard Home vs Kong Gateway

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted reverse proxy & gateways options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureAdGuard HomeKong Gateway
CategoryReverse Proxy & GatewaysReverse Proxy & Gateways
LicenseGPL-3.0Apache-2.0
LanguageTypeScriptLua
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM128 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarydocker, kubernetes, helm
GitHub stars★ 35,977★ 43,947
First released20182015
ReplacesPi-hole, NextDNSAWS API Gateway, Apigee

Why pick each one

Choose AdGuard Home if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 36k GitHub stars
AdGuard Home details

Choose Kong Gateway if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 43.9k GitHub stars
Kong Gateway details

Frequently asked questions

Is AdGuard Home or Kong Gateway better?

Neither is universally better. Kong Gateway has the larger community, while AdGuard Home is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are AdGuard Home and Kong Gateway free and open-source?

Yes. AdGuard Home is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Kong Gateway under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run AdGuard Home and Kong Gateway with Docker?

AdGuard Home: yes. Kong Gateway: yes.

Related comparisons