Ceph vs ownCloud Web

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureCephownCloud Web
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseLGPL-2.1AGPL-3.0
LanguageC++TypeScript
Setup difficultyHardMedium
Min. RAM4,096 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetes, bare-metaldocker
GitHub stars★ 16,905★ 567
First released20062020
ReplacesAmazon S3, Google DriveDropbox, Google Drive

Why pick each one

Choose Ceph if…

  • Released under the LGPL-2.1 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 16.9k GitHub stars
Ceph details

Choose ownCloud Web if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in TypeScript
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
ownCloud Web details

Frequently asked questions

Is Ceph or ownCloud Web better?

Neither is universally better. Ceph has the larger community, while ownCloud Web is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Ceph and ownCloud Web free and open-source?

Yes. Ceph is licensed under LGPL-2.1 and ownCloud Web under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Ceph and ownCloud Web with Docker?

Ceph: yes. ownCloud Web: yes.

Related comparisons