FileBrowser Quantum vs ownCloud Web
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
FileBrowser Quantum
Enhanced web file manager fork with extra features
VS
ownCloud Web
Modern web frontend for ownCloud file sharing
| Feature | FileBrowser Quantum | ownCloud Web |
|---|---|---|
| Category | File Sync & Storage | File Sync & Storage |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Go | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 7,695 | ★ 567 |
| First released | 2024 | 2020 |
| Replaces | Google Drive, Dropbox | Dropbox, Google Drive |
Why pick each one
Choose FileBrowser Quantum if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 7.7k GitHub stars
Choose ownCloud Web if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in TypeScript
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is FileBrowser Quantum or ownCloud Web better?
FileBrowser Quantum is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider ownCloud Web if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are FileBrowser Quantum and ownCloud Web free and open-source?
Yes. FileBrowser Quantum is licensed under Apache-2.0 and ownCloud Web under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run FileBrowser Quantum and ownCloud Web with Docker?
FileBrowser Quantum: yes. ownCloud Web: yes.