Apache HTTP Server vs mitmproxy
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted reverse proxy & gateways options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Apache HTTP Server
The world's most widely used web server
VS
mitmproxy
Interactive HTTPS proxy for inspection and debugging
| Feature | Apache HTTP Server | mitmproxy |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Reverse Proxy & Gateways | Reverse Proxy & Gateways |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | C | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary, bare-metal | docker, binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 4,050 | ★ 44,605 |
| First released | 1995 | 2010 |
| Replaces | Nginx, IIS | Charles Proxy, Fiddler |
Why pick each one
Choose Apache HTTP Server if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (4k GitHub stars)
- Written in C
Frequently asked questions
Is Apache HTTP Server or mitmproxy better?
mitmproxy is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Apache HTTP Server if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Apache HTTP Server and mitmproxy free and open-source?
Yes. Apache HTTP Server is licensed under Apache-2.0 and mitmproxy under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Apache HTTP Server and mitmproxy with Docker?
Apache HTTP Server: yes. mitmproxy: yes.