Apache HTTP Server vs Fabio

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted reverse proxy & gateways options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureApache HTTP ServerFabio
CategoryReverse Proxy & GatewaysReverse Proxy & Gateways
LicenseApache-2.0MIT
LanguageCGo
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM128 MB128 MB
Deploymentdocker, binary, bare-metaldocker, binary
GitHub stars★ 4,050★ 7,334
First released19952015
ReplacesNginx, IISHAProxy, Nginx

Why pick each one

Choose Apache HTTP Server if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (4k GitHub stars)
  • Written in C
Apache HTTP Server details

Choose Fabio if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 7.3k GitHub stars
  • Written in Go
Fabio details

Frequently asked questions

Is Apache HTTP Server or Fabio better?

Neither is universally better. Fabio has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Apache HTTP Server and Fabio free and open-source?

Yes. Apache HTTP Server is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Fabio under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Apache HTTP Server and Fabio with Docker?

Apache HTTP Server: yes. Fabio: yes.

Related comparisons