Envoy vs Fabio

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted reverse proxy & gateways options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureEnvoyFabio
CategoryReverse Proxy & GatewaysReverse Proxy & Gateways
LicenseApache-2.0MIT
LanguageC++Go
Setup difficultyHardMedium
Min. RAM512 MB128 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetes, binarydocker, binary
GitHub stars★ 28,735★ 7,334
First released20162015
ReplacesNginx, HAProxyHAProxy, Nginx

Why pick each one

Choose Envoy if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 28.7k GitHub stars
Envoy details

Choose Fabio if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 7.3k GitHub stars
  • Written in Go
Fabio details

Frequently asked questions

Is Envoy or Fabio better?

Neither is universally better. Envoy has the larger community, while Fabio is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Envoy and Fabio free and open-source?

Yes. Envoy is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Fabio under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Envoy and Fabio with Docker?

Envoy: yes. Fabio: yes.

Related comparisons