Fabio vs Pingora
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted reverse proxy & gateways options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Fabio
Zero-config load balancer driven by Consul
VS
Pingora
Rust framework to build fast, reliable network services
| Feature | Fabio | Pingora |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Reverse Proxy & Gateways | Reverse Proxy & Gateways |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Go | Rust |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary | binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 7,334 | ★ 27,153 |
| First released | 2015 | 2024 |
| Replaces | HAProxy, Nginx | Nginx |
Why pick each one
Choose Fabio if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 7.3k GitHub stars
- Written in Go
Choose Pingora if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- Mature project with 27.2k GitHub stars
- Written in Rust
- Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Fabio or Pingora better?
Neither is universally better. Pingora has the larger community, while Fabio is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Fabio and Pingora free and open-source?
Yes. Fabio is licensed under MIT and Pingora under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Fabio and Pingora with Docker?
Fabio: yes. Pingora: check the project docs for container support.