SHSelfHostIndex

Wetty vs WG-Easy

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted remote access & vpn options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
WE Wetty Terminal over HTTP and HTTPS VS WG WG-Easy The easiest way to run WireGuard VPN with a web UI
FeatureWettyWG-Easy
CategoryRemote Access & VPNRemote Access & VPN
LicenseMITAGPL-3.0
LanguageTypeScriptTypeScript
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM128 MB128 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metaldocker
GitHub stars★ 5,369★ 26,595
First released20142021
ReplacesPuTTYOpenVPN Access Server

Why pick each one

Choose Wetty if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 5.4k GitHub stars
Wetty details

Choose WG-Easy if…

  • Extremely easy setup
  • Friendly UI
WG-Easy details

Frequently asked questions

Is Wetty or WG-Easy better?

Neither is universally better. WG-Easy has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Wetty and WG-Easy free and open-source?

Yes. Wetty is licensed under MIT and WG-Easy under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Wetty and WG-Easy with Docker?

Wetty: yes. WG-Easy: yes.

Related comparisons