WebDAV Server Go vs Zipline
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
| Feature | WebDAV Server Go | Zipline |
|---|---|---|
| Deploy effort | Under-an-hour setup | Under-an-hour setup |
| Health score | 90 · Excellent | 88 · Excellent |
| Category | File Sync & Storage | File Sync & Storage |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | Go | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 5,877 | ★ 3,429 |
| First released | 2017 | 2021 |
| Replaces | Dropbox | Imgur, Dropbox |
What are WebDAV Server Go and Zipline?
WebDAV Server Go
A lightweight standalone WebDAV server that exposes a directory tree for syncing with WebDAV-capable clients. It is useful as a minimal sync backend for many file managers and apps.
- Standalone WebDAV
- Per-user permissions
- Minimal backend
- Cross-platform clients
Zipline
Zipline is a fast self-hosted file upload server with a modern dashboard. It supports ShareX, image embeds, URL shortening, and detailed statistics.
- ShareX integration
- URL shortener built in
- Detailed upload statistics
WebDAV Server Go vs Zipline: key differences
WebDAV Server Go is written in Go, while Zipline is built with TypeScript. WebDAV Server Go is the lighter option, starting around 64 MB of RAM against 256 MB for Zipline. WebDAV Server Go is the more established project (first released 2017), while Zipline arrived in 2021.
Why pick each one
Choose WebDAV Server Go if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 5.9k GitHub stars
Choose Zipline if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (3.4k GitHub stars)
- Written in TypeScript
Frequently asked questions
Is WebDAV Server Go or Zipline better?
WebDAV Server Go is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Zipline if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are WebDAV Server Go and Zipline free and open-source?
Yes. WebDAV Server Go is licensed under MIT and Zipline under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run WebDAV Server Go and Zipline with Docker?
WebDAV Server Go: yes. Zipline: yes.
Which is lighter on resources, WebDAV Server Go or Zipline?
WebDAV Server Go has the smaller minimum footprint at 64 MB of RAM, compared to about 256 MB for Zipline. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.
Related comparisons
- WebDAV Server Go vs Syncthing Android Wrapper
- Zipline vs Syncthing Android Wrapper
- WebDAV Server Go vs closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin
- Zipline vs closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin
- WebDAV Server Go vs copyparty
- Zipline vs copyparty
- WebDAV Server Go vs Dufs
- Zipline vs Dufs
- WebDAV Server Go vs File Browser
- Zipline vs File Browser