File Browser vs Zipline

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureFile BrowserZipline
Deploy effortUnder-an-hour setupUnder-an-hour setup
Health score15 · At risk88 · Excellent
StatusArchivedActively maintained
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseApache-2.0MIT
LanguageGoTypeScript
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM64 MB256 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarydocker
GitHub stars★ 35,937★ 3,429
First released20172021
ReplacesDropboxImgur, Dropbox

What are File Browser and Zipline?

File Browser

File Browser provides a clean web interface to manage files within a specified directory, supporting upload, download, sharing, and user accounts. It suits users who want simple browser-based access to a folder rather than a full sync platform. It ships as a single Go binary and a small Docker image.

  • Single-binary web file manager
  • User accounts and share links
  • Built-in editor and previews
  • Minimal resource usage

Read the full File Browser guide →

Zipline

Zipline is a fast self-hosted file upload server with a modern dashboard. It supports ShareX, image embeds, URL shortening, and detailed statistics.

  • ShareX integration
  • URL shortener built in
  • Detailed upload statistics

File Browser vs Zipline: key differences

The biggest difference is maintenance: File Browser's repository is archived and no longer developed, while Zipline is actively maintained. File Browser is written in Go, while Zipline is built with TypeScript. Licensing differs — Apache-2.0 for File Browser versus MIT for Zipline. File Browser is the lighter option, starting around 64 MB of RAM against 256 MB for Zipline. File Browser is the more established project (first released 2017), while Zipline arrived in 2021. File Browser has the considerably larger community, at 35,937 GitHub stars versus 3,429.

Why pick each one

Choose File Browser if…

  • Extremely lightweight
  • Trivial to deploy
  • Good for quick file access

Watch out for

  • No sync client
  • Limited collaboration features
File Browser details

Choose Zipline if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (3.4k GitHub stars)
  • Written in TypeScript
Zipline details

Frequently asked questions

Is File Browser or Zipline better?

File Browser is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider File Browser if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are File Browser and Zipline free and open-source?

Yes. File Browser is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Zipline under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run File Browser and Zipline with Docker?

File Browser: yes. Zipline: yes.

Which is lighter on resources, File Browser or Zipline?

File Browser has the smaller minimum footprint at 64 MB of RAM, compared to about 256 MB for Zipline. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.

Related comparisons