File Browser vs Zipline

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureFile BrowserZipline
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseApache-2.0MIT
LanguageGoTypeScript
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM64 MB256 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarydocker
GitHub stars★ 35,800★ 3,313
First released20172021
ReplacesDropboxImgur, Dropbox

Why pick each one

Choose File Browser if…

  • Extremely lightweight
  • Trivial to deploy
  • Good for quick file access
File Browser details

Choose Zipline if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (3.3k GitHub stars)
  • Written in TypeScript
Zipline details

Frequently asked questions

Is File Browser or Zipline better?

File Browser is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Zipline if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are File Browser and Zipline free and open-source?

Yes. File Browser is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Zipline under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run File Browser and Zipline with Docker?

File Browser: yes. Zipline: yes.

Related comparisons