SHSelfHostIndex

FileBrowser Quantum vs Zipline

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FileBrowser Quantum Enhanced web file manager fork with extra features VS ZI Zipline ShareX and file upload server with a clean dashboard
FeatureFileBrowser QuantumZipline
Deploy effortUnder-an-hour setupUnder-an-hour setup
Health score92 · Excellent88 · Excellent
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseApache-2.0MIT
LanguageGoTypeScript
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM128 MB256 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarydocker
GitHub stars★ 8,406★ 3,429
First released20242021
ReplacesGoogle Drive, DropboxImgur, Dropbox

What are FileBrowser Quantum and Zipline?

FileBrowser Quantum

FileBrowser Quantum is a community fork of File Browser that adds advanced search, multiple sources, and improved performance. It provides a web interface for managing files on a server.

  • Advanced indexed search
  • Multiple file sources
  • Improved performance over original

Zipline

Zipline is a fast self-hosted file upload server with a modern dashboard. It supports ShareX, image embeds, URL shortening, and detailed statistics.

  • ShareX integration
  • URL shortener built in
  • Detailed upload statistics

FileBrowser Quantum vs Zipline: key differences

FileBrowser Quantum is written in Go, while Zipline is built with TypeScript. Licensing differs — Apache-2.0 for FileBrowser Quantum versus MIT for Zipline. FileBrowser Quantum is the lighter option, starting around 128 MB of RAM against 256 MB for Zipline. Zipline is the more established project (first released 2021), while FileBrowser Quantum arrived in 2024. FileBrowser Quantum has the considerably larger community, at 8,406 GitHub stars versus 3,429.

Why pick each one

Choose FileBrowser Quantum if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 8.4k GitHub stars
FileBrowser Quantum details

Choose Zipline if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (3.4k GitHub stars)
  • Written in TypeScript
Zipline details

Frequently asked questions

Is FileBrowser Quantum or Zipline better?

FileBrowser Quantum is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Zipline if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are FileBrowser Quantum and Zipline free and open-source?

Yes. FileBrowser Quantum is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Zipline under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run FileBrowser Quantum and Zipline with Docker?

FileBrowser Quantum: yes. Zipline: yes.

Which is lighter on resources, FileBrowser Quantum or Zipline?

FileBrowser Quantum has the smaller minimum footprint at 128 MB of RAM, compared to about 256 MB for Zipline. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.

Related comparisons