Omnivore vs yarr

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureOmnivoreyarr
CategoryBookmarks & Read-It-LaterRSS & News Readers
LicenseAGPL-3.0MIT
LanguageTypeScriptGo
Setup difficultyHardEasy
Min. RAM1,024 MB64 MB
Deploymentdockerbinary, docker
GitHub stars★ 16,211★ 3,919
First released20222020
ReplacesPocket, InstapaperFeedly, Google Reader

Why pick each one

Choose Omnivore if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 16.2k GitHub stars
  • Written in TypeScript
Omnivore details

Choose yarr if…

  • Extremely simple to run
  • Tiny footprint
  • No dependencies
yarr details

Frequently asked questions

Is Omnivore or yarr better?

Neither is universally better. Omnivore has the larger community, while yarr is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Omnivore and yarr free and open-source?

Yes. Omnivore is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and yarr under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Omnivore and yarr with Docker?

Omnivore: yes. yarr: yes.

Related comparisons