ArchiveBox vs yarr
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
ArchiveBox
Self-hosted web archiving from bookmarks and feeds
VS
yarr
Yet another RSS reader as a single binary
| Feature | ArchiveBox | yarr |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Bookmarks & Read-It-Later | RSS & News Readers |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | Python | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | binary, docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 28,079 | ★ 3,919 |
| First released | 2017 | 2020 |
| Replaces | Feedly, Google Reader |
Why pick each one
Choose ArchiveBox if…
- Thorough page preservation
- Imports from many sources
- Open formats
Frequently asked questions
Is ArchiveBox or yarr better?
Neither is universally better. ArchiveBox has the larger community, while yarr is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are ArchiveBox and yarr free and open-source?
Yes. ArchiveBox is licensed under MIT and yarr under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run ArchiveBox and yarr with Docker?
ArchiveBox: yes. yarr: yes.