Omnivore vs Shiori

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted bookmarks & read-it-later options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureOmnivoreShiori
CategoryBookmarks & Read-It-LaterBookmarks & Read-It-Later
LicenseAGPL-3.0MIT
LanguageTypeScriptGo
Setup difficultyHardEasy
Min. RAM1,024 MB128 MB
Deploymentdockerdocker, binary
GitHub stars★ 16,211★ 11,574
First released20222017
ReplacesPocket, InstapaperPocket, Raindrop.io

Why pick each one

Choose Omnivore if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 16.2k GitHub stars
  • Written in TypeScript
Omnivore details

Choose Shiori if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 11.6k GitHub stars
Shiori details

Frequently asked questions

Is Omnivore or Shiori better?

Neither is universally better. Omnivore has the larger community, while Shiori is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Omnivore and Shiori free and open-source?

Yes. Omnivore is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Shiori under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Omnivore and Shiori with Docker?

Omnivore: yes. Shiori: yes.

Related comparisons