Fat Free CRM vs YetiForce CRM

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted crm & business apps options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureFat Free CRMYetiForce CRM
CategoryCRM & Business AppsCRM & Business Apps
LicenseMITMIT
LanguageRubyPHP
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM1,024 MB1,024 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metaldocker, bare-metal, source
GitHub stars★ 3,628★ 1,793
First released20082014
ReplacesSalesforceSalesforce, HubSpot

Why pick each one

Choose Fat Free CRM if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (3.6k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Ruby
Fat Free CRM details

Choose YetiForce CRM if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (1.8k GitHub stars)
  • Written in PHP
YetiForce CRM details

Frequently asked questions

Is Fat Free CRM or YetiForce CRM better?

Neither is universally better. Fat Free CRM has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Fat Free CRM and YetiForce CRM free and open-source?

Yes. Fat Free CRM is licensed under MIT and YetiForce CRM under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Fat Free CRM and YetiForce CRM with Docker?

Fat Free CRM: yes. YetiForce CRM: yes.

Related comparisons