ERPNext vs Fat Free CRM
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted crm & business apps options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
ERPNext
Open-source ERP for growing businesses
VS
Fat Free CRM
Ruby on Rails open-source customer relationship manager
| Feature | ERPNext | Fat Free CRM |
|---|---|---|
| Category | CRM & Business Apps | CRM & Business Apps |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | Python | Ruby |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 4,096 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 37,773 | ★ 3,628 |
| First released | 2010 | 2008 |
| Replaces | SAP, NetSuite, Salesforce | Salesforce |
Why pick each one
Choose Fat Free CRM if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (3.6k GitHub stars)
- Written in Ruby
Frequently asked questions
Is ERPNext or Fat Free CRM better?
Neither is universally better. ERPNext has the larger community, while Fat Free CRM is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are ERPNext and Fat Free CRM free and open-source?
Yes. ERPNext is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Fat Free CRM under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run ERPNext and Fat Free CRM with Docker?
ERPNext: yes. Fat Free CRM: yes.