SHSelfHostIndex

Gnomecast Timewarrior UI vs Ziit

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted time tracking options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
GN Gnomecast Timewarrior UI Graphical front-end for the Timewarrior CLI tracker VS ZI Ziit The Swiss army knife of code time tracking (alternative to WakaTime)
FeatureGnomecast Timewarrior UIZiit
CategoryTime TrackingTime Tracking
LicenseMITAGPL-3.0
LanguagePythonTypeScript
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM128 MB512 MB
Deploymentbinary, sourcedocker
GitHub stars★ 70★ 249
First released20202025
ReplacesToggl Desktop, Clockify Desktop—

Why pick each one

Choose Gnomecast Timewarrior UI if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Written in Python
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Gnomecast Timewarrior UI details

Choose Ziit if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in TypeScript
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Ziit details

Frequently asked questions

Is Gnomecast Timewarrior UI or Ziit better?

Neither is universally better. Ziit has the larger community, while Gnomecast Timewarrior UI is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Gnomecast Timewarrior UI and Ziit free and open-source?

Yes. Gnomecast Timewarrior UI is licensed under MIT and Ziit under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Gnomecast Timewarrior UI and Ziit with Docker?

Gnomecast Timewarrior UI: check the project docs for container support. Ziit: yes.

Related comparisons