Anuko Time Tracker vs Ziit
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted time tracking options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Anuko Time Tracker
Simple multi-user web time tracking system
VS
Ziit
The Swiss army knife of code time tracking (alternative to WakaTime)
| Feature | Anuko Time Tracker | Ziit |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Time Tracking | Time Tracking |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | PHP | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, source | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 207 | ★ 249 |
| First released | 2003 | 2025 |
| Replaces | Clockify, Harvest | — |
Why pick each one
Choose Anuko Time Tracker if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Written in PHP
- Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Choose Ziit if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in TypeScript
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Anuko Time Tracker or Ziit better?
Neither is universally better. Ziit has the larger community, while Anuko Time Tracker is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Anuko Time Tracker and Ziit free and open-source?
Yes. Anuko Time Tracker is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Ziit under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Anuko Time Tracker and Ziit with Docker?
Anuko Time Tracker: check the project docs for container support. Ziit: yes.