Anuko Time Tracker vs arbtt
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted time tracking options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Anuko Time Tracker
Simple multi-user web time tracking system
VS
arbtt
Automatic rule-based time tracker for desktops
| Feature | Anuko Time Tracker | arbtt |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Time Tracking | Time Tracking |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Language | PHP | Haskell |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, source | binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 207 | ★ 354 |
| First released | 2003 | 2009 |
| Replaces | Clockify, Harvest | RescueTime, ManicTime |
Why pick each one
Choose Anuko Time Tracker if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Written in PHP
- Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Choose arbtt if…
- Released under the GPL-2.0 license
- Written in Haskell
- Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Anuko Time Tracker or arbtt better?
Neither is universally better. arbtt has the larger community, while Anuko Time Tracker is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Anuko Time Tracker and arbtt free and open-source?
Yes. Anuko Time Tracker is licensed under GPL-3.0 and arbtt under GPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Anuko Time Tracker and arbtt with Docker?
Anuko Time Tracker: check the project docs for container support. arbtt: check the project docs for container support.