arbtt vs Ever Gauzy
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted time tracking options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
arbtt
Automatic rule-based time tracker for desktops
VS
Ever Gauzy
Open-source business management with time tracking
| Feature | arbtt | Ever Gauzy |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Time Tracking | Time Tracking |
| License | GPL-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Haskell | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 2,048 MB |
| Deployment | binary, source | docker, kubernetes |
| GitHub stars | ★ 354 | ★ 4,301 |
| First released | 2009 | 2019 |
| Replaces | RescueTime, ManicTime | Hubstaff, Time Doctor |
Why pick each one
Choose arbtt if…
- Released under the GPL-2.0 license
- Written in Haskell
- Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Choose Ever Gauzy if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
- Active community (4.3k GitHub stars)
Frequently asked questions
Is arbtt or Ever Gauzy better?
Neither is universally better. Ever Gauzy has the larger community, while arbtt is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are arbtt and Ever Gauzy free and open-source?
Yes. arbtt is licensed under GPL-2.0 and Ever Gauzy under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run arbtt and Ever Gauzy with Docker?
arbtt: check the project docs for container support. Ever Gauzy: yes.