Tracim vs Luckysheet

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted office suites options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureTracimLuckysheet
CategoryOffice SuitesOffice Suites
LicenseAGPL-3.0-or-later,LGPL-3.0-or-later,CC-BY-SA-2.5,MITMIT
LanguagePythonJavaScript
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM50 MB256 MB
Deploymentbare-metalsource, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 274★ 16,650
First released20232019
ReplacesDropbox, Google Drive, SlackGoogle Sheets, Microsoft Excel

Why pick each one

Choose Tracim if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0-or-later,LGPL-3.0-or-later,CC-BY-SA-2.5,MIT license
  • Written in Python
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 50 MB RAM
Tracim details

Choose Luckysheet if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Mature project with 16.6k GitHub stars
  • Written in JavaScript
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Luckysheet details

Frequently asked questions

Is Tracim or Luckysheet better?

Neither is universally better. Luckysheet has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Tracim and Luckysheet free and open-source?

Yes. Tracim is licensed under AGPL-3.0-or-later,LGPL-3.0-or-later,CC-BY-SA-2.5,MIT and Luckysheet under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Tracim and Luckysheet with Docker?

Tracim: check the project docs for container support. Luckysheet: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons