qTox vs Typebot

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted chat & communication options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureqToxTypebot
CategoryChat & CommunicationChat & Communication
LicenseGPL-3.0AGPL-3.0
LanguageC++TypeScript
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM128 MB512 MB
Deploymentbare-metal, binarydocker
GitHub stars★ 4,977★ 10,248
First released20142026
ReplacesSkype, WhatsApp

Why pick each one

Choose qTox if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Active community (5k GitHub stars)
  • Written in C++
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
qTox details

Choose Typebot if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 10.2k GitHub stars
  • Written in TypeScript
Typebot details

Frequently asked questions

Is qTox or Typebot better?

Neither is universally better. Typebot has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are qTox and Typebot free and open-source?

Yes. qTox is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Typebot under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run qTox and Typebot with Docker?

qTox: check the project docs for container support. Typebot: yes.

Related comparisons