Berty vs qTox

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted chat & communication options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureBertyqTox
CategoryChat & CommunicationChat & Communication
LicenseApache-2.0GPL-3.0
LanguageTypeScriptC++
Setup difficultyHardMedium
Min. RAM256 MB128 MB
Deploymentbare-metal, sourcebare-metal, binary
GitHub stars★ 9,268★ 4,977
First released20182014
ReplacesWhatsApp, SignalSkype, WhatsApp

Why pick each one

Choose Berty if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • Mature project with 9.3k GitHub stars
  • Written in TypeScript
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Berty details

Choose qTox if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Active community (5k GitHub stars)
  • Written in C++
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
qTox details

Frequently asked questions

Is Berty or qTox better?

Neither is universally better. Berty has the larger community, while qTox is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Berty and qTox free and open-source?

Yes. Berty is licensed under Apache-2.0 and qTox under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Berty and qTox with Docker?

Berty: check the project docs for container support. qTox: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons