Berty vs qTox

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted chat & communication options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureBertyqTox
Deploy effortRead-the-docs projectRead-the-docs project
Health score92 · Excellent15 · At risk
StatusActively maintainedArchived
CategoryChat & CommunicationChat & Communication
LicenseApache-2.0GPL-3.0
LanguageTypeScriptC++
Setup difficultyHardMedium
Min. RAM256 MB128 MB
Deploymentbare-metal, sourcebare-metal, binary
GitHub stars★ 9,306★ 4,976
First released20182014
ReplacesWhatsApp, SignalSkype, WhatsApp

What are Berty and qTox?

Berty

Berty is a secure peer-to-peer messaging application built on the IPFS-based Wesh protocol. It can operate without internet access using local networks and Bluetooth.

  • Works without internet via P2P
  • End-to-end encryption
  • No account or phone number
  • Built on IPFS

qTox

qTox is a Qt-based client for the Tox protocol, a fully distributed, encrypted, peer-to-peer communication network. It supports text chat, file transfer, voice, and video without any central servers.

  • Fully peer-to-peer, no servers
  • End-to-end encryption
  • Voice and video calls
  • File transfer

Berty vs qTox: key differences

The biggest difference is maintenance: qTox's repository is archived and no longer developed, while Berty is actively maintained. Berty is written in TypeScript, while qTox is built with C++. Licensing differs — Apache-2.0 for Berty versus GPL-3.0 for qTox. QTox is the lighter option, starting around 128 MB of RAM against 256 MB for Berty. QTox is the more established project (first released 2014), while Berty arrived in 2018.

Why pick each one

Choose Berty if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • Mature project with 9.3k GitHub stars
  • Written in TypeScript
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM

Watch out for

  • Still considered experimental
  • P2P discovery limitations
Berty details

Choose qTox if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Active community (5k GitHub stars)
  • Written in C++
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM

Watch out for

  • No offline messaging
  • Project development has slowed
qTox details

Frequently asked questions

Is Berty or qTox better?

Neither is universally better. Berty has the larger community, while qTox is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Berty and qTox free and open-source?

Yes. Berty is licensed under Apache-2.0 and qTox under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Berty and qTox with Docker?

Berty: check the project docs for container support. qTox: check the project docs for container support.

Which is lighter on resources, Berty or qTox?

qTox has the smaller minimum footprint at 128 MB of RAM, compared to about 256 MB for Berty. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.

Related comparisons