Telegram Bot API Server vs qTox

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted chat & communication options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureTelegram Bot API ServerqTox
CategoryChat & CommunicationChat & Communication
LicenseBSL-1.0GPL-3.0
LanguageC++C++
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM256 MB128 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metal, sourcebare-metal, binary
GitHub stars★ 4,395★ 4,977
First released20212014
ReplacesSkype, WhatsApp

Why pick each one

Choose Telegram Bot API Server if…

  • Released under the BSL-1.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (4.4k GitHub stars)
  • Written in C++
Telegram Bot API Server details

Choose qTox if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Active community (5k GitHub stars)
  • Written in C++
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
qTox details

Frequently asked questions

Is Telegram Bot API Server or qTox better?

Neither is universally better. qTox has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Telegram Bot API Server and qTox free and open-source?

Yes. Telegram Bot API Server is licensed under BSL-1.0 and qTox under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Telegram Bot API Server and qTox with Docker?

Telegram Bot API Server: yes. qTox: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons