Centrifugo vs qTox

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted chat & communication options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureCentrifugoqTox
CategoryChat & CommunicationChat & Communication
LicenseMITGPL-3.0
LanguageGoC++
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM256 MB128 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetes, binarybare-metal, binary
GitHub stars★ 10,590★ 4,977
First released20152014
ReplacesPusher, Firebase Realtime DatabaseSkype, WhatsApp

Why pick each one

Choose Centrifugo if…

  • Handles many connections
  • Easy to integrate
Centrifugo details

Choose qTox if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Active community (5k GitHub stars)
  • Written in C++
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
qTox details

Frequently asked questions

Is Centrifugo or qTox better?

Neither is universally better. Centrifugo has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Centrifugo and qTox free and open-source?

Yes. Centrifugo is licensed under MIT and qTox under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Centrifugo and qTox with Docker?

Centrifugo: yes. qTox: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons