SHSelfHostIndex

TimeTagger vs Virtual TimeClock

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted time tracking options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
TI TimeTagger Tag-based time tracker with an interactive timeline VS VI Virtual TimeClock Powerful, easy-to-use time tracking software
FeatureTimeTaggerVirtual TimeClock
CategoryTime TrackingTime Tracking
LicenseGPL-3.0⊘ Proprietary
LanguagePythonUnknown
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM128 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, sourcebare-metal
GitHub stars★ 1,769—
First released20212020
ReplacesToggl, Harvest—

Why pick each one

Choose TimeTagger if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (1.8k GitHub stars)
TimeTagger details

Choose Virtual TimeClock if…

  • Released under the ⊘ Proprietary license
  • Written in Unknown
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Virtual TimeClock details

Frequently asked questions

Is TimeTagger or Virtual TimeClock better?

TimeTagger is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Virtual TimeClock if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are TimeTagger and Virtual TimeClock free and open-source?

Yes. TimeTagger is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Virtual TimeClock under ⊘ Proprietary. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run TimeTagger and Virtual TimeClock with Docker?

TimeTagger: yes. Virtual TimeClock: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons