Beaver Habit Tracker vs Virtual TimeClock

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted time tracking options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureBeaver Habit TrackerVirtual TimeClock
CategoryTime TrackingTime Tracking
LicenseBSD-3-Clause⊘ Proprietary
LanguagePythonUnknown
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM512 MB512 MB
Deploymentdockerbare-metal
GitHub stars★ 1,812
First released20262020
Replaces

Why pick each one

Choose Beaver Habit Tracker if…

  • Released under the BSD-3-Clause license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (1.8k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Python
Beaver Habit Tracker details

Choose Virtual TimeClock if…

  • Released under the ⊘ Proprietary license
  • Written in Unknown
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Virtual TimeClock details

Frequently asked questions

Is Beaver Habit Tracker or Virtual TimeClock better?

Neither is universally better. Beaver Habit Tracker has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Beaver Habit Tracker and Virtual TimeClock free and open-source?

Yes. Beaver Habit Tracker is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and Virtual TimeClock under ⊘ Proprietary. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Beaver Habit Tracker and Virtual TimeClock with Docker?

Beaver Habit Tracker: yes. Virtual TimeClock: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons