Titra vs Virtual TimeClock
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted time tracking options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Titra
Fast time tracking for freelancers and small teams
VS
Virtual TimeClock
Powerful, easy-to-use time tracking software
| Feature | Titra | Virtual TimeClock |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Time Tracking | Time Tracking |
| License | MIT | ⊘ Proprietary |
| Language | JavaScript | Unknown |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, source | bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 496 | — |
| First released | 2019 | 2020 |
| Replaces | Toggl, Harvest, Clockify | — |
Why pick each one
Choose Titra if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in JavaScript
Choose Virtual TimeClock if…
- Released under the ⊘ Proprietary license
- Written in Unknown
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Titra or Virtual TimeClock better?
Titra is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Virtual TimeClock if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Titra and Virtual TimeClock free and open-source?
Yes. Titra is licensed under MIT and Virtual TimeClock under ⊘ Proprietary. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Titra and Virtual TimeClock with Docker?
Titra: yes. Virtual TimeClock: check the project docs for container support.