SeaweedFS vs Zenko CloudServer
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
SeaweedFS
Fast distributed storage for blobs and files
VS
Zenko CloudServer
Zenko CloudServer, an open-source implementation of a server handling
| Feature | SeaweedFS | Zenko CloudServer |
|---|---|---|
| Category | File Sync & Storage | File Sync & Storage |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Go | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes, binary | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 33,952 | ★ 1,936 |
| First released | 2015 | 2026 |
| Replaces | Amazon S3 | — |
Why pick each one
Choose SeaweedFS if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
- Mature project with 34k GitHub stars
Choose Zenko CloudServer if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (1.9k GitHub stars)
- Written in JavaScript
Frequently asked questions
Is SeaweedFS or Zenko CloudServer better?
Neither is universally better. SeaweedFS has the larger community, while Zenko CloudServer is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are SeaweedFS and Zenko CloudServer free and open-source?
Yes. SeaweedFS is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Zenko CloudServer under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run SeaweedFS and Zenko CloudServer with Docker?
SeaweedFS: yes. Zenko CloudServer: yes.